Peter Costello

Media Transcripts

Bank fees; Senate obstructionism; stem cell research; St George Bank

TRANSCRIPT
THE HON PETER COSTELLO MP
Treasurer

Doorstop
Melbourne
Friday, 21 June 2002
12.10 pm

 

SUBJECTS: Bank fees; Senate obstructionism; stem cell research; St George Bank

JOURNALIST:

Treasurer the Reserve Bank has indicated, has released figures which indicate that Australians are paying record bank fees. What's your reaction to that?

TREASURER:

I think it is important that the Reserve monitor these things. I think it is very important that Australian banking consumers know the fees that are being charged in the interests of transparency and I would say to consumers that the way in which to minimise fees is to look for those products which are no-fee products. A number of the banks have already started offering those and the banks as a whole are working towards getting an industry-wide product which is a no-fee product. But shop around. Don't take the banks' word for it. Banks are there to make profits, they will charge you fees, if you want the best service, shop around and get the lowest fee paying account.

JOURNALIST:

Are they charging too high fees?

TREASURER:

Well, I think that there are some products that people use that do have fees too high. There are ordinary transaction accounts which have high fees and for people who don't have many, they should go to an account that has transactions, a minimum monthly transaction for no fees. And I think that there are some accounts which are too high and people have got to exercise consumer choice and competition to try and get better products and to force the banks to offer those better products.

JOURNALIST:

What about Government regulation?

TREASURER:

Well, the Government ensures that there is complete transparency in relation to this. The Government of course, is in the business of cutting fees on bank accounts. This is the Government which abolished the Financial Institutions Duty which was a tax on people who were putting money in to bank accounts, $1.2 billion of fees abolished, and we have a program now to abolish the Bank Account Debits tax, a tax for taking money out. But the amount that the banks themselves charge are private sector fees that they are charging for services. I think, for some of those services, there are very high fees and I would say to people, shop around because there are better deals going. And if consumers take their business elsewhere, believe me, the banks get the message. Now one of the examples of this is that there was a bank recently which decided to change its policy in relation to frequent flyer points retrospectively. And when consumer reaction to that was known, it was forced very rapidly to change its position. Consumer power, choice, competition, these are the things which are going to drive bank fees down.

JOURNALIST:

Treasurer, the consumers association suggest that the Government has the power to direct an ACCC investigation or alternatively to sit down and work out some way of capping the cost of bank fees and not charging at least any more than they actually cost. Is the Government interested in going down that path?

TREASURER:

Well the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has full power now to investigate any complaint against any bank. It doesn't need anything in addition. It is there, right there at the moment. It has the full power to do it. And if anybody has an example of where there is deceptive conduct or misuse of market power or any of those sorts of things, they can take that to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. Indeed, if in relation to their own bank accounts, if they have a complaint, they can come to the Ombudsman. That is part of what we are down here for today, to enhance consumer rights.

JOURNALIST:

Mr Costello what do you think is the likelihood of a double dissolution on border protection?

TREASURER:

Look, the Australian Constitution provides that if a measure is twice rejected by the Senate there is the option of going back to the people. Now, no measure has been twice rejected yet. But if that were the case, then the Constitution would be fulfilled. That doesn't mean that the Government would necessarily exercise its right but the Senate has to take that into account. The Senate has to take into account that it is not the popularly elected house of the Australian Parliament, the Labor Party did not win the election, the Democrats did not win the election. They have a capacity to frustrate a Government's will but under the Constitution, if they do that twice then there is a mechanism for resolving that. Whether the Government would do it would only be considered when those circumstances arise and they haven't arisen.

JOURNALIST:

How would an early election affect your leadership ambitions?

TREASURER:

Well, as I have just said, there is no prospect of an early election at this stage because there is no Bill that has been twice rejected, and even if there were a Bill that had been twice rejected, that doesn't mean that the Government would necessarily go to the people. So it is far too premature to talk about double dissolutions or early elections. What we have is a number of Bills which have now been rejected once. The pharmaceutical benefits changes, to put the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme on a financially sustainable basis, have been rejected. I call on the Senate to reconsider its position. The Labor Party did not win the election. The Australian Democrats did not win the election. Governments which are elected in the House of Representatives are generally allowed to introduce their Budgets. They have rejected those Budget measures once. I call on them to think again and think again in the interests of running a proper Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.

JOURNALIST:

Mr Costello, just in relation to the stem cell legislation, there's reports today of research today that adult stem cells may be just as effective as embryonic stem cells in fighting disease such as Alzheimer's. Would that sort of research change your, or that sort of information be likely to change your vote in relation to this legislation?

TREASURER:

Well look, I haven't read the research, I don't know the details of it, but obviously the way in which I approach this issue will be on the basis of the best information so I will certainly be looking at all of the information that's available. I can't tell you, because I haven't seen it, or the detail of it, whether it would change my mind. But I will certainly be looking at it. Anything else that happens as well.

JOURNALIST:

Mr Costello, come June 30, St George's articles of association lapse, meaning that one individual shareholder can own more than 10 per cent and a takeover bid can happen. Can you give us your thoughts on, does the Government wish to see a regional like St George remain (inaudible) New South Wales?

TREASURER:

Look, if another bank were to make an offer for an existing bank, it would need to pass the competition test which is administered by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. It would also require the Treasurer's approval on the grounds of public interest. Now if an offer were to be made, it would be considered on its merits then. I am not going to pre-judge it because that would be improper. I am not going to speculate on whether it is going to happen because it hasn't happened. But if it were to happen they would be the two matters that would be considered.

Thanks very much.

21 Jun 2002

View more media transcripts …

Latest News

Paris Diary

Peter Costello Paris Diary

Read more …

PPI - Rising Role of Sovereign Wealth Funds

Peter Costello Rising Role of Sovereign Funds Speech

Read more …

The Hole Truth

Peter Costello in the Daily Telegraph

Read more …

Videos

Video Screenshot

Watch videos …